Too Late for 2026: New York Centrists Must Build Their Own Ballot Line for 2028

A Separate Political Organization Could Reclaim Deep-Blue House Seats and Win a Three-Way Senate Race

Abstract: New York’s closed Democratic primaries are leaving many liberal, pro-Israel and policy-oriented voters without a political home. The candidates in the most closely watched New York City congressional races are nearly all liberal on domestic policy; the principal divisions concern Israel, allegiance to Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s political movement and the willingness to employ increasingly absolutist rhetoric against its opponents. Moderate Democrats joined by independents may constitute a larger general-election coalition, but they cannot elect a candidate whose name is absent from the November ballot. It is too late to create that alternative in 2026. For 2028, centrists must stop competing for permission to remain in the Democratic Party and organize, nominate and petition their own candidates onto the ballot from the beginning.

I. The 2026 Primaries and the Politically Homeless Middle

At this writing, the results of the June 23 congressional primaries are not yet known. But the contests have already revealed something important about the direction of New York’s Democratic Party. These are not traditional battles between liberals and conservatives. Nearly all the leading candidates are liberal on abortion, labor rights, LGBTQ protections, immigration, taxation and the social safety net. In NY-7, even candidates opposing Mamdani-backed Claire Valdez hold strongly progressive positions. In NY-10 and NY-13, the most consequential dividing line is Israel and whether candidates will join Mamdani’s effort to move the congressional delegation toward the democratic-socialist left.

Mamdani has endorsed Brad Lander against Representative Dan Goldman, Valdez for the open NY-7 seat and Darializa Avila Chevalier against Representative Adriano Espaillat. He described the American Israel Public Affairs Committee as one of the “monsters” preventing the birth of a new political world and subsequently defended that language. He did not expressly call every AIPAC donor a monster. But political organizations are made up of people, and much of AIPAC’s support comes from Jewish Americans who believe that Israel’s survival and a strong American-Israeli relationship are legitimate political objectives. Dehumanizing an organization inevitably reaches the citizens who support it.

I am what might be called a card-carrying AIPAC supporter. I also favor a pragmatic path toward improved universal health coverage, protection of Medicaid, more portable insurance and targeted assistance that helps borrowers eliminate student debt earlier in life. Yet under the political vocabulary Mamdani has introduced, support for those liberal economic objectives does not matter. Because I support AIPAC and Israel, his rhetoric places people like me among the “monsters.”

The atmosphere surrounding Goldman’s campaign illustrates the danger. Poetica Coffee served Goldman and his young daughter without initially recognizing him. The shop later refunded his purchase, announced that it did not serve “genocide enablers,” suggested that his money probably came from AIPAC and told him never to return. Mamdani eventually said that the online post went beyond ordinary political disagreement, but he stopped short of an unambiguous condemnation. A mayor who wishes to govern the entire city should have been able to say plainly that political disagreements do not justify publicly humiliating and excluding a Jewish congressman from a neighborhood business.

A relatively small number of voters in several low-turnout, safely Democratic primaries may therefore determine not only who represents New York City, but what the Democratic Party appears to stand for nationally. Candidates selected in these districts will become prominent congressional voices, while Republicans across the country will use their statements to define Democrats running in far more moderate states and districts. The consequences will extend well beyond New York.

My differences with the progressive wing also extend far beyond Israel. My paper A Durable Path Forward on American Health Care supports broader and more continuous coverage while rejecting both Republican retrenchment and the disruptive replacement of nearly all existing insurance with Medicare for All. My Third-Party Tax Reconciliation Approach to Student Debt rejects both indiscriminate debt cancellation and a repayment structure that leaves borrowers indebted into middle age or retirement. The Four Economic Questions argues that government must acknowledge scarce resources, fiscal trade-offs and the consequences of every spending decision.

These are governing questions. Too much of the progressive movement instead offers slogans, moral accusations and performative politics without workable transition plans, durable financing or serious consideration of unintended consequences. I have reluctantly concluded that the Democratic Party, as presently constituted and increasingly influenced by this movement, is not capable of governing responsibly. It is more interested in demonstrating ideological purity than in designing policies that can be enacted, financed and sustained.

II. Why It Is Too Late for 2026

New York does not categorically prohibit a defeated primary candidate from continuing on another ballot line. The candidate must ordinarily have secured that line before the primary. Independent nominating petitions for the 2026 general election had to be filed between May 19 and May 26, almost a month before the June 23 primary.

A defeated Democrat also has no general right to seize an existing minor-party nomination after the votes are counted. A lawful substitution requires a recognized vacancy and compliance with additional election-law procedures. A write-in campaign remains technically possible, but it is not a realistic substitute for appearing on the printed ballot.

Goldman and other non-Mamdani candidates may still win. The structural lesson remains unchanged. A centrist who loses the Democratic primary without securing another line beforehand has no practical route back onto the November ballot.

For 2026, the opportunity has passed.

III. New York’s Third-Party Precedent

New York has a long history of consequential minor-party candidacies. The clearest precedent is James L. Buckley’s 1970 Senate victory. Running on the Conservative Party line, Buckley won a three-way contest with approximately 39 percent of the vote, defeating Democratic nominee Richard Ottinger and Republican incumbent Charles Goodell.

Buckley was not a centrist, but his victory demonstrated the relevant electoral principle. When the two major-party nominees leave a substantial portion of the electorate politically homeless, a well-organized third candidate can win New York with a plurality.

IV. The 2028 Centrist Imperative

Centrists must begin building a statewide political organization now. It will need a recognizable identity, legal counsel, financing, professional petition operations, congressional-district organizations and a credible process for selecting candidates. Most important, its candidates must commit to the independent line from the outset rather than treating it as insurance after losing a Democratic primary.

The first objective should be to return safely Democratic House seats to pragmatic representation by appealing to moderate Democrats, pro-Israel liberals, independents and center-right voters who cannot support either democratic socialists or many Republican nominees.

The second objective should be the 2028 Senate election. If Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez seeks and wins the Democratic nomination, a credible centrist could compete against her and the Republican nominee in a three-way race. The centrist would not need 50 percent. A coalition of politically homeless Democrats, independents and moderate Republicans could win a plurality.

Mamdani’s movement understands that political power belongs to those who organize before the election. In 2026, centrists waited to learn whether they had lost the Democratic primaries before considering alternatives. In 2028, they must stop asking the Democratic Party to take them back and place their own candidates on the ballot from day one.

Support my efforts to create policy papers for third-party candidates by subscribing.